The ruling upheld an earlier decision that said the province’s health privacy laws do not bar patients from seeking legal action against hospitals if their privacy is breached.
In a potentially precedent-setting decision,
the Ontario Court of Appeal granted patients the right to sue hospitals
over privacy breaches Wednesday.
The unanimous ruling said provincial health
privacy laws are not a roadblock to patients who want to seek justice in
the courts when their medical records are snooped into by hospital
workers.
The decision comes on the heel of aStar investigation into health-related privacy violations and oversights in Ontario’s health privacy legislation.
“This case is a vindication for all of those
victims the Star has been writing about,” said Michael Crystal, lawyer
for the patients.
Wednesday’s ruling could have sweeping
implications for the province’s 155 hospitals as it has given the green
light to a multimillion-dollar privacy class action launched against
Peterborough Regional Health Centre.
Peterborough hospital would not answer
questions from the Star about whether it intends to appeal the ruling to
the Supreme Court of Canada, its last chance to get the case tossed
out.
A massive privacy breach at the hospital between 2011 and 2012 saw hundreds of patient medical records snooped into and seven staff members fired. The breach included a domestic violence victim who was in hiding and 414 abortion files that were inappropriately accessed by a high profile anti-abortion campaigner.
A group of affected patients launched a
$5.6-million privacy class action against the hospital, which in turn
fought to have the case thrown out in the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice, arguing the courts had no jurisdiction over health-related
privacy breaches.
The crux of the hospital’s argument was that
health privacy violations were the sole domain of the privacy
commissioner and that the Personal Health Information Protection Act
(PHIPA) ousts the jurisdiction of the courts.
The Superior Court ruled against the hospital
so it took the fight up to the Court of Appeal, which dismissed the case
Wednesday.
In its decision, the appeal court said health
privacy legislation does not exclude the jurisdiction of the courts.
Health privacy laws were tailored to handle “systemic issues rather than
individual complaints,” the court said.
Peterborough Regional Health Centre declined
to comment on the decision, saying “this matter remains in litigation
before the courts.”
In a written statement to the Star Wednesday, a
Peterborough hospital spokesperson said the center had a “zero
tolerance policy with respect to inappropriate access to medical
records.”
The hospital has 60 days to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Acting Information and Privacy Commissioner Brian Beamish told the Star he was “very pleased” with the ruling.
All patients who are victims of privacy
violations should have the option of filing a complaint to the privacy
office or taking civil action, Beamish said.
Under PHIPA, the privacy commissioner’s office
acts as a watchdog over health institutions, ensuring they are
protecting patient information and abiding with privacy laws.
It is not up to the privacy commissioner,
however, to determine whether a patient should be awarded monetary
damages. The commissioner only has the power to recommend the Attorney
General launch a prosecution under PHIPA, which allows for fining
individuals up to $50,000 and institutions up to $250,000 if found
guilty.
Only one prosecution has been lodged so far under the act, which was introduced in 2004.
“This was a really important issue to get judicial guidance on,” Beamish said.
Ontario, once a leader in health-information
privacy laws, now seems to be lagging behind as other provinces tighten
up reporting. Earlier this year the Star found that eight other jurisdictions have passed laws to force hospitals to report breaches to the appropriate privacy body.
The heart of the Peterborough case is
“snooping” — where hospital staff willfully break the law by accessing
medical records when they have no authority to do so, such as in the
recent Rob Ford privacy violations, he said.
Health care workers can only access a
patient’s medical record if they are involved in their care and, Beamish
said, the Peterborough breach “highlights how seriously this issue of
snooping needs to be taken.”
The lead plaintiff of the Peterborough case is
Erkenraadje Wensvoort, who was in hiding when she had an operation at
the hospital. In the statement of claim, she alleges that she had left
an abusive relationship after 51 years of marriage.
Wensvoort says she was told a staff member had
opened her file without authorization and she feared her allegedly
abusive ex-husband had “paid someone to access her patient records in
order to find her,” the decision read.
There is no evidence linking Wesnvoort’s ex-husband to the inappropriate access of her record, according to Crystal, her lawyer.
The court awarded Wensvoort $24,000 for the legal fees associated with the appeal.
Crystal, who is the lawyer for all the Peterborough patients, said the court’s ruling grants patients “access to justice.”
“The highest court in Ontario has spoken and
said invasion of personal health information is not something that is
simply the domain of the privacy commissioner,” he said.
“Patients do not have to go through the administrative nooks and crannies of PHIPA legislation to achieve access to justice.”
If the latest decision is not appealed by the
hospital, Crystal said the next step would be setting dates for a motion
of certification for the Peterborough case.
Privacy commissioners from other parts of
Canada told the Star earlier this year that they have noted a rising
trend of health-care professionals snooping into private medical records with malicious intent.
Source: http://www.thestar.com/life/health_wellness/2015/02/18/patients-can-sue-hospitals-for-invasion-of-privacy-appeal-court-rules.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.