Two women developed serious infections after getting needles at Rothbart Centre. But it took a freedom-of-information request to learn more patients had been infected.
Two weeks after Anne
Levac went to a Toronto pain clinic for an injection of steroids for
chronic back pain, the 68-year-old Fenelon Falls woman fell seriously
ill. She was rushed to hospital by ambulance, she says, while falling in
and out of consciousness and suffering excruciating pain.
Two months later, in
October 2012, a similar scenario played out after Tracey Martin, 46,
visited the same clinic. The woman, who lives north of Toronto, says
that 11 days after getting an epidural steroid injection at the Rothbart Centre for Pain Care she ended up in a hospital ER in rough shape.
Both women developed
bacterial infections in their spines following their visits to the
Dufferin St. clinic: Levac was diagnosed with an epidural abscess and
Martin with bacterial meningitis, as well as an epidural abscess.
Today, they live with
disabilities caused from permanent nerve damage. They cannot control
their bladders and bowels and are unable to walk without canes.
A Star investigation
found Levac and Martin were not the only ones who developed serious
bacterial infections following visits to the clinic. The probe also
found:
All nine patients were
given injections by anesthesiologist Dr. Stephen James, who was
unknowingly “colonized” with the bacteria, meaning it was present on his
skin but never made him sick.
RELATED:
Two of the infected
patients developed meningitis and epidural abscesses, one developed
meningitis and bacteremia (bacteria in the blood), one got meningitis
and five got epidural abscesses.
Bacterial meningitis
is a potentially deadly condition in which the brain and spine’s
protective membrane becomes inflamed. An epidural abscess is a rare
infection between the outer membrane of the spinal cord and the bones of
the spine. It is also potentially life-threatening.
James argues that
though staph A was present on his skin it is difficult to know whether
he was the source of the bacteria that infected the patients. Three
different surfaces tested by Toronto Public Health at the clinic were
also found to be contaminated.
He also says: “I am
very remorseful and regretful (about what) happened to these people … I
think about it every day that I hurt these people.”
Dr. Peter Rothbart,
founder and medical director of the clinic, says he was unaware there
was an infection control problem, pointing out the clinic passed a CPSO
inspection a year before.
Toronto Public Health does not consider it part of its mandate to post outbreak inspection results on its website.
The college, which has
regulatory oversight of the clinic, provides few details of inspection
outcomes on its website. There is no mention on its online register that
there had been an outbreak, that nine patients became ill or that there
were 170 infection-control deficiencies.
The CPSO requires
physicians to disclose to patients when harm has been incurred during
the delivery of health care. It recognizes harm is not always
preventable or indicative of substandard care.
James never contacted
Levac and Martin to explain what went wrong, according to the women. He
never volunteered that he learned during the Toronto Public Health
investigation that he was colonized with the bacteria, they say.
Critics argue there
must be more public disclosure about the kind of problems that occurred
at the clinic, particularly at a time when the clinic sector is growing
rapidly. The province is pushing more services out of hospitals and into
community clinics, known as “out-of-hospital premises.” There are 274
such clinics in Ontario today, up from 251 in 2012. Among the services
they provide are pain treatment, colonoscopies and cosmetic surgery.
Tom Closson, former
president of the Ontario Hospital Association and a proponent of moving
services out of hospitals, says it’s important for patients and
physicians to know whether clinics have safe track records so they can
make informed decisions about using them.
“If you are a
physician who is going to refer your patients to a particular clinic,
you would want to know whether there are any issues with that clinic,
and if there are issues, what has been done to address them. Certainly,
as a patient, you would want to know the same,” he says.
Steve Rastin,
president of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association, is puzzled that
Toronto Public Health doesn’t make public the results of inspections,
like the one it did on the clinic.
The public health unit
posts online inspection results for restaurants, tattoo parlours and
nail salons, he points out. As well, its website shows weekly updates of
outbreaks at hospitals, nursing homes and retirement homes.
“It’s disturbing to
the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association that public restaurants appear to
be held to a higher standard of accountability than clinics that provide
medical services to the public,” Rastin says.
Medical negligence
lawyer Paul Harte, who represents Levac, says the public should have
access to Toronto Public Health investigation results and college
inspection outcomes: “Those are two easy steps which are going to
prevent future harm from happening and there is really no reason not to
do those two things.
“As these women
struggled with their health, the clinic and Dr. James withheld critical
medical information from their patients,” Harte says. “TPH also raised
unnecessary barriers to their right to know. Patients have a right to
know. It shouldn’t be like pulling teeth.”
Rothbart says it would be helpful to clinics if there were more public information about problems other clinics have run into.
“We should be constantly learning and constantly up to date on any new information,” he says.
Toronto Public Health
began investigating the clinic in late November 2012 after learning some
of its patients had come down with meningitis. Cases of meningitis must
be reported to public health authorities.
During the probe, James told public health officials he had heard from other patients who had also developed infections.
More sick patients
were found during a “lookback,” during which calls were placed to 264
patients who had visited the clinic in preceding months to see how they
were doing.
Source: http://www.thestar.com/life/health_wellness/2014/09/20/public_not_told_of_infection_outbreak_at_private_toronto_pain_clinic.html
Source: http://www.thestar.com/life/health_wellness/2014/09/20/public_not_told_of_infection_outbreak_at_private_toronto_pain_clinic.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.