Nine private medical clinics in Ontario have been found to be providing substandard care that places patients at risk, according to a report to be released Monday by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
Nine private medical
clinics in Ontario have been found to be providing substandard care that
places patients at risk, according to a report to be released Monday by
the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
But the same
legislation that gave the college the authority to inspect the clinics
also forbids it from publicly identifying the ones that got failing
grades.
The report doesn’t say
whether the substandard clinics are still open, identify the doctors
who work in them, or reveal if any of those doctors face disciplinary
action.
It also does not specify what kinds of services the failing clinics provide.
“We are not allowed to
discuss the failed premises,” said Dr. Bob Byrick, president of the
college and chair of its “out-of-hospital premises” inspection
committee.
Byrick said
legislation passed by the province two years ago that gives the college
authority to inspect private clinics also prevents it from revealing too
much information about them.
Queen’s Park gave regulatory oversight of private clinics to the college following the 2007 death of Krista Stryland, who underwent liposuction surgery at the Toronto Cosmetic Clinic.
The college’s powers
are limited to ordering doctors to stop working at the clinics in
question and to stop performing procedures for which they failed to meet
standards.
The college is
releasing its first inspection report Monday. An advanced copy obtained
by the Star reveals that of 251 clinics, 178 passed inspection, 64
passed with conditions and nine failed.
In addition to
cosmetic surgery, the clinics in question provide colonoscopies,
cataract surgery and pain alleviation treatment. They all use
anesthesia.
Byrick said he is
prohibited by the legislation from revealing how many of the failing
clinics provide each of the services in question. Nor, he said, can he
reveal where in Ontario they are located.
He was unaware of
whether any doctors at failed clinics were facing disciplinary action by
the college. And he said he did not know if any of the clinics in
question had closed.
NDP health critic
France Gelinas maintains that the legislation doesn’t actually preclude
the college from naming names, it just does not explicitly state that it
can.
She pointed the finger
at Ontario’s Liberal government rather than the college, arguing that
the province was “sheepish” when it had the opportunity to create
stronger legislation.
“This is a remnant of
(a time when some thought) doctors knew best and didn’t question the
doctor. It brings about in many parts of the health-care system a lack
of transparency and lack of accountability,” Gelinas charged.
“It does not serve us well. It might have been fine in 1950s, but we are now in 2012,” she added.
Gelinas said the college is doing the best it can, given that it goes up against doctors with deep pockets.
“They have resources
to hire teams of lawyers and it would cost an arm and a leg for that
little agency to mount a case against them,” she said.
Byrick said the
inspection program should give Ontarians greater confidence in private
clinics, especially at a time when they are increasing in number.
“We have to minimize
the risk of anesthesia and surgery really in any environment and there
are particular risks in out-of-hospital premises that were a gap in
regulatory oversight and that has been rectified,” he said.
“So the public should
be reassured when they have a procedure done in these premises that in
fact the standards meet our expectations,” he added.
The Liberal government
wants to move more services out of hospitals and into non-profit
clinics. Most of the 251 clinics now operating in Ontario are
for-profit. And while they are operated privately, many receive public
funds.
It was the result of
such an inspection by the college that last year resulted in some 6,800
patients being informed they had a small risk of contracting hepatitis
B, C and HIV and being advised to get tested. College assessors
discovered that an Ottawa endoscopy clinic had not been properly
sanitizing equipment.
While Byrick said he
couldn’t discuss specific situations, one case in Ottawa has been widely
covered in the media. It was reported that the college ordered the
gastroenterologist Dr. Christiane Farazli
to stop performing endoscopies. The clinic subsequently closed and the
college is investigating Farazli. She is working elsewhere but not
performing endoscopies.
When assessing
clinics, the college looks at whether there are problems with infection
control, qualifications of staff and the types of drugs and equipment
being used.
In cases where clinics
passed inspections with conditions, they may have been required, for
example, to upgrade equipment or mediation.
Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/2012/12/03/private_clinics_fail_inspections_but_names_kept_secret.html
Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/2012/12/03/private_clinics_fail_inspections_but_names_kept_secret.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.