Monday, October 6, 2014

Police will investigate Mississauga doctor if watchdog complains

But College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario won’t say whether it will report Dr. Sastri Maharajh, who was disciplined for sexually abusing as many as 13 female patients.

Regulators such as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario should be more accountable to patients, one expert said, noting that the college could have revoked Dr. Sastri Maharajh's licence, but chose not to do so.

RICK MADONIK / TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO 
 
Regulators such as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario should be more accountable to patients, one expert said, noting that the college could have revoked Dr. Sastri Maharajh's licence, but chose not to do so. 

Peel Regional Police say they will investigate a Mississauga doctor disciplined for professional misconduct after sexually abusing more than 10 women if the province’s medical regulatory body complains.
But the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario won’t say whether it will do so.
It’s keeping secret the details of any approach to local police services regarding Dr. Sastri Maharajh, who admitted to either placing his mouth on or resting his cheek on the breasts of as many as 13 female patients between 2005 and 2011.
Maharajh returned to work at a Mississauga walk-in clinic in July after an eight-month suspension. He isn’t allowed to treat women, and must post a clearly visible sign in his waiting room saying he can treat men only. Maharajh objected to these conditions at his penalty hearing, asking instead for his appointments with women to be supervised, but the committee decided his risk of reoffending was too great.
The Star’s multiple attempts to reach Maharajh at his home and clinic for comment were unsuccessful.
The college’s decision raises questions about whom the regulatory body is trying to protect — physicians or patients.
Marilou McPhedran, director of the Institute for International Women’s Rights at the University of Winnipeg’s Global College, headed two separate task forces in 1991 and 2001, looking at sexual abuse of patients by health-care professionals.
She said government and regulatory bodies need to be more accountable to patients.
In Maharajh’s case, McPhedran said the college could have revoked the doctor’s licence under the Regulated Health Professions Act.
“They have more than enough legal jurisdiction to use their discretion to exercise their responsibility, as members of a college, to make their decision on the basis of what is in the best interest of public and patient safety,” she said. “They chose not to.”
Instead, the discipline committee used a discretionary loophole in the act to suspend Maharajh and put conditions on his licence. The act allows less severe punishment for sexual transgressions that do not involve sexual intercourse, various forms of contact with the genitals, the anus and the mouth, or masturbation.
Not enough has changed in the more than two decades since the first task force was commissioned, McPhedran said.
“There’s a simple question to ask here: who benefits from continuing, year after year after year, not to fully utilize what the legislation allows to protect the public? Who benefits?”
A complaint of sexual abuse against Maharajh was reported to the college by an unidentified female patient in July 2011; Maharajh later disclosed to the college that similar incidents happened with 10 to 12 other women.
Peel police Const. Lillian Fitzpatrick said Maharajh’s name has not appeared on an arrest report. If the college made a complaint and provided police with specific information, such as the patient’s name, they could launch an investigation.
“What we would probably have to do in that case is get a warrant to obtain any written documentation, anything they would have to substantiate that claim,” Fitzpatrick said. “Then we would initiate (an investigation) through the victims.”
Fitzpatrick said although police will look into complaints of sexual abuse, a successful investigation ultimately comes down to a victim’s willingness to proceed.
In an email to the Star on Thursday, spokesperson Kathryn Clarke said while the college regularly receives and shares information with police in “appropriate circumstances,” she can’t speak to Maharajh’s case specifically.
“… In deciding whether to share information, the circumstances of the particular case are ‎considered, including the wishes of the complainant,” she said.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/09/19/police_will_investigate_mississauga_doctor_if_watchdog_complains.html
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments.

Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.