To save money, the fairness at the core of Ontario's workers' compensation system is being undermined.
I had the great
privilege to serve as chair of what is now called the Workplace Safety
and Insurance Board (WSIB) in the early 1990s. As an immigrant from
Italy and then a member of Ontario’s Provincial Parliament, I had
observed firsthand the difficult circumstances of injured workers and
the important role of the board in helping them get back on their feet.
As chair, I did my
best to strengthen the WSIB’s support to those workers, especially
around rehabilitation and return to work. So I have a personal stake in
the changes now underway at the board — changes that are undermining
decades of progress and that all Ontarians ought to oppose.
These changes were well illustrated by two recent articles in the Star. One showed
that many of the criteria used by WSIB to justify surveillance of
inured workers unfairly target those who are new immigrants or whose
injuries seem to be taking too much time to heal.
Another recounted
two cases of injured workers who were denied compensation because the
WSIB maintained that x-rays found evidence of degenerative disc disease
(a “pre-existing condition”) in their spines. Never mind that both of
these workers had been able to work for many years before their
workplace injuries.
These stories represent a historic and unfortunate departure from established WSIB practice.
The board has no
policy or legal authority allowing it to deny benefits because of
pre-existing conditions. In fact, current policy and many years of
appeal decisions make clear that the board should pay benefits to
workers who were able to work before their injury and unable to work
afterwards.
Recently, the WSIB
proposed a policy to overturn the long-standing approach, which, if
approved, would undermine the basic principle upon which the system was
based.
Ontario’s workers’
compensation system has always required balance between the contribution
of the employers and the benefits paid to the injured workers. It was
built with fairness at its core.
And yet, since the
1970s, successive governments have kept employers’ contributions
artificially low, allowing an “unfunded liability” to develop. The WSIB
doesn’t have the money to fund likely future benefit claims.
In the early 1990s,
the board concluded it needed to raise employers’ contribution to 3 per
cent of payroll to eliminate the unfunded liability by 2014.
Unfortunately, when Mike Harris took power, his government lowered the
contribution to 2 per cent. And though it also reduced payouts to
injured workers, the unfunded liability skyrocketed.
To deal with this
problem, the McGuinty government appointed as WSIB president David
Marshall, an accountant, who was granted a stipend of $400,000 a year
plus a performance bonus of 20 per cent.
In 2010, Marshall told
the legislature he had to cut costs. He said he would develop a plan
that would have “some tough, tough proposals in it. I mean you can’t
recover this amount of money without … pain somewhere in the system … I
don’t get any bonus unless I can meet this target.” Not one word about
the revenue side.
Instead, under
Marshall’s watch, denied claims increased by 50 per cent. Benefits to
injured workers have been reduced by $631 million; the rehabilitation
program has been decimated; long-term wage loss benefits have been
reduced by 28 per cent; hundreds of WSIB employees have been laid off;
and injured workers’ pensions have been reduced by 31.3 per cent.
This is not only
having a devastating impact on injured workers; it is also downloading
costs onto our social assistance and health care systems. And the
workers’ compensation system has been brought to a stall, with thousands
and thousands of appeals and lengthy and unacceptable delays in dealing
with them.
That’s not all. In
2011, Marshall was granted the unprecedented authority to change
autocratically most WSIB policies without board approval.
The Star has
documented how Marshall is exercising this power. If he is allowed to
implement the infamous policy on “pre-existing conditions,” this will
allow the WSIB to deny benefits because of, say, age.
In fact, the board has
already begun illegally implementing the policy. The WSIB routinely
writes to workers, warning them: “please be aware that … the WSIB may
determine that the current condition is more likely related to the
natural aging process or to the progression of an underlying
pre-existing condition.” So the worker is zapped despite the
long-standing policy that compensation will be granted if the injury is a
significant factor in causing the worker’s disability.
Injured workers, the
medical profession, community groups, and many others have decried the
absurdity and unfairness of what the WSIB is doing. So far, to no avail.
If Marshall succeeds, he will surely reduce the unfunded liability, but
at what cost?
The destruction of our
workers’ compensation system will create bitterness and polarize
workers and employers. After a century of progress, we will once again
have thousands of injured workers desperate and deprived of justice and
the means to support their families. Rather than going down this harmful
path, we ought to work together instead on the prevention of workplace
injuries and diseases, and the re-employment of injured workers.
Odoardo Di Santo is a former Ontario MPP and chair of the workers’ compensation board.Source: http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2014/06/27/ontarios_workers_compensation_system_is_under_attack.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.