Monday, September 29, 2014

Class-action lawsuit aims to help Ontario injured workers

Toronto lawyer launches multimillion-dollar lawsuit on behalf of Ontario injured workers who had payouts reduced due to pre-existing conditions.

Former Brampton sewer worker Pietro Castrillo, 61, is part of a multi-million dollar class action lawsuit against the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) for discounting non-economic loss awards due to pre-existing medical conditions.
/ Laurie Monsebraaten

Former Brampton sewer worker Pietro Castrillo, 61, is part of a multi-million dollar class action lawsuit against the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) for discounting non-economic loss awards due to pre-existing medical conditions.

A Toronto lawyer has launched a multimillion-dollar class action lawsuit on behalf of injured workers against Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.
The lawsuit, filed in Ontario Superior Court last month, alleges the board acted in bad faith and “with public malfeasance” when it reduced benefits for pain and suffering for thousands of injured workers with medical conditions that weren’t causing impairment before their workplace accidents.
“For 22 years, the board has calculated non-economic loss awards based on a point system that recognized the impact of injuries on degenerative disease,” said lawyer Richard Fink.
“But several years ago, the board instructed case managers to deduct for pre-existing conditions without any formal changes in policy, regulations or law,” he said in an interview Friday. “What they are doing is illegal.”
As reported by the Starlast week, injured workers’ advocates are alarmed by a proposed board policy on pre-existing conditions they say would legitimize this practice.
Before the election call, they wrote an open letter to Premier Kathleen Wynne, saying the change would contravene the “historic compromise” behind Ontario’s 100-year-old no-fault insurance plan, which saw injured workers give up their right to sue in exchange for fair and just compensation for as long as a workplace disability lasts.
A WSIB spokeswoman said the board considers Fink’s lawsuit to be “completely devoid of merit and will vigorously defend all allegations.”
“We are committed to ensuring that every injured worker receives the appropriate level of benefits,” Christine Arnott said in an email. “The WSIB is proud of its record in providing service to injured workers in Ontario.”
Non-economic loss awards are granted by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) to cover pain and suffering for injured workers who suffer permanent physical and psychological impairments from a work-related injury or illness.
Fink’s lawsuit, which still has to be certified by the court, seeks damages from the board for its alleged behavior, including expenses incurred by workers challenging decisions on their claims.
“The Board moved aggressively to reduce its costs by clawing back legitimate awards to injured workers, forcing them into lengthy and costly legal battles to win back what they should never have lost,” said Fink. “The lawsuit seeks to right this wrong and hold the board to account for its actions.”
Pietro Castrillo of Brampton is just one of the many injured workers whose non-economic loss award was wrongfully reduced by the WSIB due to a “secret policy” the board adopted to cut costs in 2011-2012, Fink alleges in the statement of claim.
The 61-year-old man tore his rotator cuff and permanently injured his shoulder while working for a sewer construction company in 2011.
He was eligible for a non-economic loss award of about $2,500. But since medical tests found evidence of osteoarthritis in his shoulder, the WSIB reduced his award by half to $1,230, according to the lawsuit. Castrillo appealed and won because this pre-existing condition had never impaired his ability to work in the past. However, Castrillo is still out more than $600 he had to spend in legal fees to fight the case, the lawsuit says.
“Personal-injury awards have increased dramatically over the years, but WSIB awards have stayed the same or gone down,” said Fink, whose firm, Fink & Bornstein, has represented injured workers for more than 30 years.
“I don’t think it’s constitutional to rob people of reasonable damages within the WSIB system,” he added.
Fink’s firm is holding public meetings in Mississauga and Toronto later this month to find other injured workers to join the class action.

source:  http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/05/12/classaction_lawsuit_aims_to_help_ontario_injured_workers.html

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments.

Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.