In Aviva Insurance
Company of Canada v. Frank McKeown (2016), Aviva brought an
application to determine whether an insurer is obligated to state
their reason for an examination under oath (EUO) in order to compel a
person claiming statutory accident benefits (SABS) to attend an EUO,
if requested by their insurer, pursuant to subsection 33 (2) of the
SABS. Aviva was seeking a legal order to compel the named respondents
to attend their respective EUOs.
Source/more:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments.
Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.