Sunday, May 10, 2015

Court Critiques Defence Doctor’s Opinion Following “Flawed” Investigation

In today’s case (Chenier v. Szili) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2010 rear end collision caused by the Defendant.  The collision resulted in significant injuries.  In the course of the lawsuit the Defendant had the Plaintiff examined by a physician who provided evidence minimizing the connection between some of the plaintiff’s symptoms and the collision.

http://bc-injury-law.com/blog/court-critiques-defence-doctors-opinion-flawed-investigation?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+IcbcLaw+%28ICBC+Law%29

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments.

Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.