Showing posts with label health canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health canada. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Insurance coverage for medical marijuana on the horizon: experts


TORONTO (NEWS 1130) – Canadians who have been prescribed medical marijuana could one day see their insurance company footing the bill, experts predict, following the introduction of new Health Canada rules that allow for the sale of cannabis oils....

More:


Saturday, February 21, 2015

Crisis in Ontario health-care system deepens: Hepburn

A critical part of our health care system is grossly underfunded and inefficient, with underpaid, overworked employees scrambling to keep up with growing demand for services.

OurWindsor.Ca
A bitter strike by 3,000 nurses and other health professionals now dragging into its third week is providing a rare and disturbing glimpse into Ontario’s home- and community-health sector.
What the strike by workers at 10 Community Care Access Centres across the province has exposed is clear evidence that this increasingly critical part of our health care system is grossly underfunded and inefficient, with underpaid and overworked employees scrambling — and too often failing — to keep up with growing demand for services. 

The result of this worsening mess is that tens of thousands of patients across the province, ranging from seniors to young schoolchildren, often receive too little or no care at home, in nursing homes and schools. 

It’s especially true for patients pushed quickly out of hospitals in an effort to save money and turned over to CCACs, which oversee home- and community-care, to provide such services as rehab therapy, speech training for stroke victims and help getting dressed in the morning. 

At the same time, the stresses and demands being placed on community health-care professionals have created a group of dedicated workers who rightly feel frustrated, disillusioned and underappreciated. 

For years, successive governments have talked boldly about the need to focus more resources on community care. However, barely 5 per cent of the province’s health care budget goes to home- and community-health care. 

Instead of injecting serious money into the sector, the government has provided only token extra help, while at the same time forcing hospitals to kick patients out of costly hospital beds as fast as possible. 

Today, the proof that our community-care sector is short of money and treated like a second-class part of our health system is everywhere. 

In the CCACs, managers desperate to save money are forcing care co-ordinators to reduce home-care services for needy patients. “Our managers sit down with us on a regular basis to discuss ‘high users’ and ways in which we may be able to decrease home support services,” one Peterborough area care co-ordinator wrote in an email, adding she is “sickened by this penny pinching.” 

In private companies contracted by CCACs to provide the front-line workers who actually treat patients face-to-face, managers are squeezing their own employees. They do so by setting strict limits on the time therapists and nurses can spend with a patient, refusing to pay for mandatory professional training and cutting workers’ hours. Most of these employees haven’t seen any pay raise in a decade. 

In community health centres and nurse practitioner-led clinics, workers have seen their pay frozen by Queen’s Park for the last nine years. “We are just going to be collateral damage,” with the province likely arguing yet again that they cannot afford raises if and when doctors and nurses get more money, suggests Adrianna Tetley, CEO of the Association of Ontario Health Centres

Clearly, fundamental reform of home and community care in Ontario is desperately needed. 

Health Minister Eric Hoskins has stated repeatedly that such reform is one of his top priorities. 

In the coming weeks, Hoskins will have a tremendous opportunity to make good on his comments by acting on two major reports to land on his desk.
First, a provincial panel created last year to review home and community care, chaired by Gail Donner, the former dean of the faculty of nursing at the University of Toronto, was to have submitted its report to Hoskins at the end of January. Hoskins should release the panel’s findings and recommendations immediately. 

Second, the provincial auditor was ordered last spring by the Ontario legislature to review the financial operations of the CCACs. That report is due this spring.
With these reports in hand, and a provincial budget coming later this spring, the Liberal government has a real chance to revamp the entire system. 

For too long foot-dragging and finger-pointing by the Liberals, Conservatives and New Democrats at Queen’s Park and by timid health ministry bureaucrats have derailed any meaningful reform efforts. 

If Queen’s Park politicians fail again, they will have only themselves to blame.
Sadly, such failure will be another blow to community health professionals who have seen their incomes eroded over the years and their skills rarely acknowledged by bosses and politicians who are more interested in bottom lines than insuring decent and fair levels of care. 

Ultimately, though, the real losers will be our sick, our elderly and our dying who will be forced to struggle even harder to get the care they need and deserve. 

Toronto Star

Source: http://www.insidebrockville.com/opinion-story/5335239-crisis-in-ontario-health-care-system-deepens-hepburn/

Sunday, February 1, 2015

NDP wants secret info on Ontario’s top billing doctors made public


January 22, 2015 3:29 pm

AP Photo/Cleveland Clinic, Janine Sot

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Infected and undocumented: Thousands of Canadians dying from hospital-acquired bugs

| | Last Updated: Jan 20 9:24 AM ET
More from Tom Blackwell | @tomblackwellNP

Brenda Dyck, the sister in-law of Kim Smith holds her portrait as her father, Gord Smith and brother Trevor Smith look on in her Winnipeg, Manitoba home. Kim Smith, went to hospital last year for an elective hysterectomy, the surgical wound became infected and she ended up dying in agony days later from necrotizing fasciitis - flesh eating disease.

Kim Smith was no stranger to stress — her job in community corrections often brought her face to face with members of Winnipeg’s violent street gangs.
But as she lay in a local hospital’s gynecology ward more than a year ago, nurses called her brother with an unusual question: Did Kim suffer from any kind of emotional troubles?


The woman, her caregivers said, had been telling them she wanted to kill herself.
It was a shocking turn of events, coming a week after Ms. Smith entered St. Boniface Hospital for a routine hysterectomy and ovary removal. In the days since the operation, however, she had been complaining of escalating pain in her gut, so intense she began to fear for her life — and then apparently wanted to end it.

By the time medical staff took the woman’s complaints seriously, an infection inside her belly had developed into necrotizing fasciitis (flesh-eating disease) and devoured large chunks of her abdomen.

Within hours of emergency surgery to drain “brown, foul-smelling liquid” and excise dead tissue, and four days after her 45th birthday, Ms. Smith was dead.
“She kept yelling at me, ‘I know my body, I know there’s something wrong in my stomach and nobody wants to listen to me. And I’m going to end up dying here,’ ” said Brenda Dyck, her sister-in-law. “She died the most horrible, painful death anybody could suffer, and nobody would listen to her and reach out to her.”
Ms. Smith’s tragic demise was more dramatic than many cases of hospital-acquired infection (HAI).  Necrotizing fasciitis is a frightening, but rare, complication. Still, about 8,000 Canadians a year die from bugs they contract in facilities meant to make them better, while many more see their hospital stay prolonged by such illness.

Yet after years of well-intentioned work and millions of dollars spent on combatting the scourge, the details and extent of the problem remain murky.
No national statistics, for instance, document the number of surgical-wound infections like Ms. Smith’s, one of the most common types of hospital-acquired pathogens.

A federal agency now publishes rates of sepsis, or blood infection, at individual hospitals, but their methodological value is a matter of debate. Government tracking of worrisome, drug-resistant bacteria is patchy and of questionable practical use, say infectious-disease physicians.

“There is no question that at a national level, both our surveillance for hospital-acquired infection and our surveillance for anti-microbial resistance is not serving our needs,” said Allison McGeer, an infectious-disease specialist at Toronto’s Mount Sinai Hospital. “[And] we know, very substantially, that you can’t fix what you’re not measuring.”

Meanwhile, important lessons about how diseases spread inadvertently within health facilities often come to light in fits and start.

Two hospitals in Toronto and one in Quebec, for instance, announced independently in the late 2000s that they had discovered contaminated sinks were the source of separate, deadly outbreaks of infection.

Some word of the episodes got out through specialized medical journal articles, academic conferences and sporadic news stories. But there is no systematic way of disseminating such information across the system, said Darrell Horn, a former patient-safety investigator for the Winnipeg Region Health Authority.
“It’s just totally loosey-goosey,” he said.
You could sit and call every hospital in the country, and ask them when was the last time they cleaned the sink in the [neonatal intensive care unit] and how they cleaned it, and you’d get nothing but blank stares
“You could sit and call every hospital in the country, and ask them when was the last time they cleaned the sink in the [neonatal intensive care unit] and how they cleaned it, and you’d get nothing but blank stares.”

Handout
 
 
Health care is paying much more attention, at least, to the HAI problem than it did a decade ago, said Dr. Michael Gardam, infection-control director at Toronto’s University Health Network.

Following heavy media coverage of the mostly hospital-based SARS outbreak and numerous deadly hospital infestations of C. difficile, facilities started hiring more experts, encouraging hand-washing and generally striving to prevent infection – rather than just treat it after the fact as an unavoidable cost of doing medical business.

Dr. Gardam’s hospitals have even begun characterizing hospital-acquired infections as adverse events, akin to more traditional medical error.
Whether because of such measures or not, Ms. Smith had few fears when she entered St. Boniface on Sept. 30, 2013, for an operation for uterine fibroids, her family says.

She likely did not know that most surgical-wound infections arise from bacteria patients carry into hospital on their skin, which can then sneak inside through incisions, especially when infection-control safeguards are not optimum.

As early as the day after her operation, the Métis woman began to complain of pain in her abdomen, only to be told by nurses that she simply needed to walk about, Ms. Dyck recalls.

Some of that suffering is reflected in her patient charts, obtained by the family and provided to the National Post.

On Oct. 1, she complained of gastrointestinal bloating and discomfort; the following day, heartburn, bloating and slight nausea, the records note.
On Oct. 3, the chart refers to her feeling unwell and weak, then projectile vomiting. The next day, she had “lots of gas pains,” and the day after that abdominal pain “controlled with PO” (prescription opioids).
Finally, early on Oct. 6, came the call about her self-destructive thoughts.
“Nurse found her confused, half-naked, pulled her IV out anxious. Saying she is at her end and is suicidal,” the chart said. A later notation suggested anxiety was prolonging her recovery and the sedative Ativan was administered.

Then, sitting at her side 12 hours later, her brother Trevor Smith noticed a strange purple discolouring of his sister’s feet, the kind of “mottling” that can be a sign of imminent death, and raised the alarm.

Lyle Stafford for National Post

Ms. Smith was soon being wheeled into the operating room, where the surgeons who opened her up first observed “a large effluent of brown, foul-smelling liquid from the abdominal cavity.” They removed several abscesses, drained the liquid, then discovered the worst — necrotizing fasciitis expanding through the peritoneum (the lining of the abdomen) and abdominal muscles.

St. Boniface declined to comment on the case, saying it was prevented from doing so by provincial legislation. But Ms. Dyck said one doctor told her staff had likely not adequately disinfected her sister-in-law’s stomach before the hysterectomy, ensuring any bacteria that came with her into the operating room stayed on the outside.

medical-errors-

While not every surgical infection is preventable, “they can be dramatically minimized” with well-documented precautions, Dr. Gardam says.

If hospital infections are at least sometimes preventable, to what extent is the problem being monitored and how much of that information becomes public?
Some provinces, such as Ontario and British Columbia, require hospitals to report to the government on a few common infections, such as C. difficile, blood infections transmitted by the “central lines” used to access major blood vessels, and pneumonia from ventilator use. Ontario hospitals must report their compliance with tactics designed to prevent surgical infections, though not the infections themselves.

Experts debate whether publicly reporting data actually benefits health care, but a 2012 study found that C. difficile rates in Ontario hospitals dropped by 25% after the province started divulging statistics on the disease.

Many provinces, though, have no such requirements, and the national picture is hazy. The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) reports rates of sepsis, and stats that indirectly address infection, such as the rate of death and re-admission to hospital following some procedures.

Some infectious-disease specialists, though, are unimpressed by its infection numbers, obtained by analyzing hospital records after the fact.

“Garbage in, garbage out,” Dr. McGeer said of the figures. “You cannot count infections using CIHI data, and CIHI knows that.”

What is needed to paint an accurate picture is experts at each hospital reporting “true cases,” she says.

That is the goal of the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program, arguably the country’s premiere example of transparency on the diseases that health care gives its patients.

The program’s focus is drug-resistant bacteria, the increasingly familiar methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and C. difficile. It is based, though, on a sampling of just 57 teaching hospitals, a fraction of the country’s 250 or so acute-care hospitals. The SARS outbreak, for instance, erupted at a community hospital that is not part of that network.

Infectious-disease doctors have long complained that it takes too long for the data those hospitals submit to the Agency to be posted.

Lyle Stafford for National Post

“If I want to know what’s happening with MRSA, I call my friends,” said Dr. McGeer.

More complete, and easier to access, is the system developed by the European Centre for Disease Control, says Lynora Saxinger, an infectious-disease specialist at the University of Alberta. It not only tracks drug-resistant bugs, but matches those stats with the use — or possible over-use — of antibiotics, considered the main cause of the problem.

The latest concern of infectious-disease specialists is a class of antibiotic-defeating organisms known as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriacaeae (CRE), a “game changer,” said Dr. Saxinger. The death rate is as high as 50%.
CRE is part of the public health agency’s surveillance system, meaning those 57 hospitals submit their numbers, but Dr. McGeer said all acute-care hospitals in Canada should have to report them.

Meanwhile, “the last CRE outbreak … I heard about it on the news,” said Dr. Saxinger.

There is no evidence Ms. Smith was infected with a drug-resistant organism, but by the time she went in for emergency surgery, it appears little could have saved her. Indeed, once begun, necrotizing fasciitis has a 70% death rate.
Early the next morning, her blood pressure had sunk, the tell-tale black of more dead tissue had spread around her side to her back and she went into cardiac arrest, dying minutes later.

The hospital investigated the incident and assured the family that lessons learned from it would be passed on to staff — and help future patients, says Ms. Dyck. Mr. Horn says his experience across Canada suggests it is unlikely those lessons will be shared with anyone else in the health-care system, or the public.
Meanwhile, Ms. Dyck says the sight of doctors and nurses fruitlessly attempting to revive her sister-in-law — her abdomen left open as part of the flesh-eating treatment — remains etched in her mind, as is the thought it might all have been prevented.

“What I witnessed, I was traumatized by for months and months,” she said.
“It was just a terrible, terrible, painful death. And she knew she was going to die, that’s the worst thing.”

National Post
• Email: tblackwell@nationalpost.com | Twitter:

Source: http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/01/19/infected-and-undocumented-thousands-of-canadians-dying-from-hospital-acquired-bugs/
 

FCAD hosts panel blasting Health Canada on transparency


medical_secrets-11
Photo: Andrei Pora

By Gabriela Panza-Beltrandi

The Faculty of Communication and Design presented a panel Tuesday on the code of silence surrounding Canada’s healthcare system, exploring how Health Canada and various quasi-public agencies obstruct journalists and the public from getting access to vital information about health and health care in Canada.

Rob Cribb, an investigative reporter at the Toronto Star and Ryerson journalism instructor, spoke at the panel about his personal experiences trying to access information from these organizations. He explained that one of the biggest obstacles to gaining access to vital information about health and health care in Canada is the Quality of Care Information Protection Act (QCIPA).

“QCIPA is essentially a blanket exemption hospitals can use to limit the information they are mandated to provide to the public,” said Cribb.

Because of this act, requests for information filed by journalists or members of the public can take months if not years to be answered (if their request is not denied altogether), and Cribb explained how many times, the final information that is not censored and delivered contains no relevant data.

“The reason it’s so tough is that the system is gauged against us… It’s set up to ensure secrecy,” said Cribb whom suggested 99 per cent of complaints and concerns concerning negligence filed to the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons are kept from the public.

Aside from these rare cases, the panel spoke about how a major problem in Canada is its difficulty to hold anyone accountable because of how hidden information is.

Joel Lexchin, an emergency physician at the University Health Network and a professor in the School of Health Policy and Management at York University, explained why transparency is important in regards to Health Canada, especially with the way it regulates prescription medication.

“The information Health Canada [sees about drugs] is not also seen by independent scientists,” said Lexchin. “This is no real way to know how good a job the people at Health Canada are doing… Without somebody else being able to look at that data, we have no idea.”

Lexchin said that with the limits Canada gives drug companies and Health Canada on how much they can approve to be revealed, many important details are left out.

Drug companies have to supply Health Canada with  information to get their drugs on the market; results of animal tests, lab tests, and human tests. Health Canada reviews the drug before approving or denying it, but the public does not get to see these comments from the reviewers explaining their decisions, and we don’t know the names of the drugs Health Canada did not approve to be released.

Lexchin says releasing this information is vital to give doctors a better knowledge of exactly what drugs they are prescribing patients, instead of just the minimal information drug companies provide them with.

“Doctors need to get objective information… That information is in the reviews that Health Canada had done about the product, but we don’t get those reviews.”

In some cases, researchers have had to turn to the U.S.’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to gather information about drugs used in Canada because of how much easier that access is granted across the border.

“No one in Canada seems to care about it,” said Cribb. “The United States would have been outraged about this kind of security. In Canada, we smile and nod, and we say ‘oh well.’ and too often frankly, journalists do that… we don’t challenge these ridiculous delays and denials.”

He added: “There really are no checks and balances on [the industry] other than us. The only thing that strikes a moment of fear in the heart of a drug CEO… is an impending story to be published on the front page… If we’re not doing that, then there is no other check and balance that puts the public’s interest first.”

Source: http://theeyeopener.com/2015/01/fcad-hosts-panel-blasting-health-canada-on-transparency/