Monday, May 19, 2014

FAIR cries foul over Bill 171 hearings

Some of the heavy hitters in the Ontario insurance scene made the pilgrimage to Queen’s Park to present their arguments for the passing of Bill 171 – but one group who was bumped at the last minute is crying foul.

The Insurance Bureau of Canada and the Insurance Brokers Association of Ontario each sent delegations  for hearings on Bill 171 – but one group, FAIR (Fair Association of Victims for Accident Insurance Reform), fired off a press release to express its displeasure at having its time slot pulled at the last minute.

“A generous 15 minutes to speak to the committee on the issues that affect the nine million drivers in Ontario and then we just don't. Poof - it's gone,” said Rhona DesRoches, FAIR board chair. “Only eight presenters, none of whom speak to the issues of Ontario's accident victims.”

DesRoches explains that FAIR was told "late Monday afternoon" that there was a spot in the two hours that were allotted for only eight presenters on the changes contained in Bill 171 on Wednesday afternoon.

“With only 48 hours of notice we scrambled to make travel arrangements and a speech, galvanized our members to respond with their concerns – only to find out… that our appallingly short 15 minutes of presentation time had disappeared,” said DesRoches.

The Vice-President, Ontario of the IBC Ralph Palumbo, led a contingent of IBC representatives that included Barb Taylor, Ryan Stein and Lee Samis to present their case before the Standing Committee on Bill 171 last week. Others stating their case before the committee were Dr. Bob Haig, CEO of the Ontario Chiropractic Association; Eric K. Grossman of The Advocates’ Society; Larry Gold of the Fair Value Committee; Dorianne Sauve, CEO of the Ontario Physiotherapy Association; Craig Hirota of the Associated Canadian Car Rental Operators; Michael Mouritsen of the Association of Management, Administrative and Professional Crown Employees of Ontario; and Arthur Lofsky and Debbie Thompson of the IBAO.

DesRoches continues that “it might be easier to think of those tens of thousands of people lined up at FSCO to have hearings as fakers and malingerers but the numbers don't lie, they are a reflection of a broken system and not a reflection of rampant fraud in the system.

 “It's 2003 all over again, as one government exits, they take a moment to put the boots to some very vulnerable people. In 2003 it was Ernie Eves with Ontario Regulation 237/13 slashing benefits on the eve of an election. And accident victims have been taking a beating ever since with promises of rate reductions that result in stripped coverage.”

DesRoches rhetorically asks what the shape of Ontario’s auto insurance will take with the passing of Bill 171.

“When does it end? When insurers finally get what they want, premium dollars and zero payments?” she asks. “We are only $3,500 away from zero in this attack on our public systems. We need to do something.”



COMMENTS
  • TammyK on 09/05/2014 7:48:24 AM
    With the standing committee given the task of making decisions to help pass Bill 171 or defeat it, WE the PUBLIC, would like to have some comfort in knowing the decision was an INFORMED one. One, that takes in the effects this Bill 171 will have on millions of drivers. Thousands of survivors already trying to make a maximum recovery.

    Charter of Rights Chapter 15(1) states,

    “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability”.
    Stop trading accident victims’ rights to fair hearings, and the benefits they need for maximum recovery, for insurer dollars.
    Accident victims see Bill 171, not as a fraud fighting measure but as a template for reducing benefits paid to injured drivers.

    Let's face it, allowing Ontario’s insurers to sell us insurance that only works half of the time and for half of those injured is WRONG!

  • Rick on 08/05/2014 1:03:00 PM
    Accident victims and consumers overall should have had the time at hearings that affect so many in a negative way. The stripping of access to ordinary justice by our government for accident survivors is a direct reflection of what the IBC asked for in 2009 in the 5 year review. Closing out the views of the people that use the insurance we are all sold, indeed that we are legislated to buy, is unfair. But then unfair business practice is part of the industry model isn't it? 


    Source:  http://www.insurancebusiness.ca/news/fair-cries-foul-over-bill-171-hearings-177622.aspx?p=2

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments.

Canadian Insurance News does not endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that we have the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever.